← Search

Celeste Schmidt

Plano, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 19W–15L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Celeste Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deganit Gal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-02 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Nederhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-20 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Ehrisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-13 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deganit Gal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-06 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Ehrisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams