← Search

Carolyn Altman

South Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Altman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Kroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Wolfle Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramiro Rivas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Sheehy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darryl Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helle Hegelund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-12-13 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maki Shewfelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-12-07 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-08 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Cheung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 60% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.9% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams