← Search

Angela Cole

SPRINGFIELD, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 48W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Cole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-06-01 · Indy A40 3.5W BRE Sepanski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-18 · Indy A40 3.5W BRE Sepanski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sun Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sun Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greta Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Shattuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Michelle Bergren / Tammy Neal
2024-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britani Sepanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Angel Dean / Lisa Nelson
2023-11-13 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Rasmussen (IHP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sun Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Rasmussen (IHP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britani Sepanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-30 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Rasmussen (IHP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sun Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-16 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Rasmussen (IHP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sun Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2023-09-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Golightly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.2%
30W–19L · 53.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.5% of games
6.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova