← Search

Pam Womack

— year-end
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Pam Womack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-05-18 · Tigar/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellan Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · Tigar/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellan Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Tigar/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Flanagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · Epps/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Fleenor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Tigar/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Flanagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Epps/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Fleenor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Patty Vanvalkinburgh / Mary Miller
2026-04-06 · Tigar/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Epps/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Fleenor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-20 · YoungA/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-12 · Williams/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-05-05 · Williams/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-27 · Martin/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 49.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe