← Search

Ramona McKenzie

Grand Junction, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 68W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ramona McKenzie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-09-10 · GJTC KHUGHES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Bleil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · GJTC KHUGHES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-31 · GJTC KHUGHES · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-17 · GJTC KHUGHES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keely Eberly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · GJTC KHUGHES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · GJTC SREINER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Stouffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · GJTC SREINER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Reiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · GJTC SREINER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · GJTC SREINER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Wrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · GJTC KDEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Stouffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 64.9% of games
3.5
36.5%
31W–54L · 46.6% of games
7.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
14W–20L · 45.7% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova