← Search

Ellen Rambo

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 38W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ellen Rambo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-03 · HV- Cutler 55s 6.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annemarie Dolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolynn Hayman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · HV- Cutler 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Kretzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · HV- Cutler 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Kretzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolynn Hayman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Margaret Gross / Megan Johnson
2026-05-26 · RCAA-Burns 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-01 · 1HV-Cutler 65 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathalie Vandecan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 54% of games
3.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.6% of games
3.5
40.5%
15W–22L · 46.4% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.8% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King