← Search

CINDY JEFFERS

Bend, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 21W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add CINDY JEFFERS to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
Audrey Nguyen / Erica Jordan
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · SOR-ACB-White/Rocher · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julianne Wimberly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · SOR-ACB-White/Rocher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julianne Wimberly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · ACB-Swaggerty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · ACB-Swaggerty · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · ACB-Swaggerty · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-05 · ACB-Swaggerty · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · ACB-Swaggerty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · ACB-Swaggerty · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · ACB-Swaggerty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Antoniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · ACB-Rogers/Massey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 63.1% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 41.8% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 47.3% of games
8.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 38.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer