← Search

Alison Halopoff

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 20W–20L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Alison Halopoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2023-07-23 · CSU GOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-07-07 · CSU GOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Teresa Adsit / Angela Brown
2023-06-15 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Trevino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-05-28 · CSU GOLD · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-05-25 · CSU GOLD · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-20 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-04 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Trevino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-07-21 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Elizabeth Smith
2022-07-18 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-1
W
2022-06-16 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-06-09 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-27 · CSU · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
50%
20W–20L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#2 Singles
25%
10 matches
#1 Singles
23%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova