← Search

Matthew Scott

— year-end
14 matches · 8W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Matthew Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Fee - Cortez · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with William Haveman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · Fee - Cortez · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Isaac Vergara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Wilkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
David Stevens / Sean Bennett
2026-05-21 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen Plum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Machado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Wilkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen Plum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-12-18 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Lutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-12-11 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mathew Deater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-12-04 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-20 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Callum Tulloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-10 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Helpling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova