← Search

Fabian Schmahl

Cincinnati, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 10W–5L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Fabian Schmahl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2024-07-20 · Queen City · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-08 · Queen City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Inglert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-01 · Queen City · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-07-15 · Queen City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Tufft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Chris Ahn
2023-05-20 · Queen City · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Tony Hennies / Steve O'Connor
2022-07-16 · Queen City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Byron Stallworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Brandon Williams
2022-07-09 · Queen City · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-06-25 · Queen City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Slayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Cristiano Trojani
2022-06-18 · Queen City · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-17 · Camargo · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2021-06-19 · Camargo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hebard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-06-12 · Camargo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
5 matches
#2 Singles
27%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer