← Search

Jane Rosenman

Rochester, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 15W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jane Rosenman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Top Shelf Spinners Coleman RTC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Top Shelf Spinners Coleman RTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Bulbulian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · Still Serving Coleman RTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · Still Serving Coleman RTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · Still Serving Coleman RTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Peloquin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
L
2026-02-22 · Balcom Tundratown Topspin RTC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Becker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-25 · Balcom Tundratown Topspin RTC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Becker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-05 · Tennis Divas Stoltenberg RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Barwise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-09-14 · Tennis Divas Stoltenberg RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Barwise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-09 · Grip & Rip Coleman RTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lihong He
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-08 · A Team Reeve RTC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-07-01 · A Team Reeve RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charie Diehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert