← Search

Noelle Hage

— year-end
90 matches · 53W–37L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Noelle Hage to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-05-11 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · SARASOTA/Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Sprungman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · SARASOTA/Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Sprungman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · LWR Slice Slice Baby · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · LWR Slice Slice Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Sprungman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-20 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Sprungman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · SARASOTA/Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Sprungman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · SARASOTA/Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Baynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · LWR Slice Slice Baby · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · LWR Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · LWR Scott · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Ceccacci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.8%
35W–30L · 51.6% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova