← Search

Nancy Isaacs

— year-end
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Nancy Isaacs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2022-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pallavi Mehta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Camhi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Freedman-Carmen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Freedman-Carmen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Suzie Skop / Julie Chang
2021-07-20 · TIA GRINDERS 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Beth MacAulay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2021-07-13 · TIA GRINDERS 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Goodstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-06-29 · TIA GRINDERS 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Beth MacAulay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2019-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Elcik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Tardio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Mendez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Debbie Meyer / Joan Cordy
2019-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Mendez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Stephanie Gilmartin / Eileen ORourke
2019-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Mendez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe