← Search

Jordan Tupper

— year-end
96 matches · 48W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jordan Tupper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Aceholes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cayne Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Aceholes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cayne Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Aceholes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Antonisse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Aceholes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Partridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Aceholes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Antonisse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Behemoth · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clint Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hunter Antonisse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Weinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · OK/ECC · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Addison Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hunter Antonisse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · OK/ECC · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hannah Bowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Weinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 49.2% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 45.5% of games
4.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 57.4% of games
4.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 44% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.1% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert