← Search

Ann DeLaney

Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 45W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann DeLaney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
Joan Rubenstein / Marsha Craney
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 6.0W LNHS Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Marsha Craney / Joan Rubenstein
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 6.0W LNHS Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Julie Myers / Jacqueline Bartelt
2026-06-22 · Indy A55 6.0W LNHS Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Goldenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Julie Myers / Kari Huddleston
2026-06-19 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Roever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A55 6.0W LNHS Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Goldenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Roever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Catt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leigh Ann Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-28 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Roever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Robyn Gibboney / Melissa Kennedy
2026-05-21 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · Indy A40 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Roever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.3% of games
3.0
35.2%
25W–46L · 43.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.8% of games
5.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 40.8% of games
6.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 42.5% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer