← Search

JEHAN BHAGWAGAR

Astoria, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 99W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JEHAN BHAGWAGAR to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Gustavo Fernandez Ranvier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Reynante Sabud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-01 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Birman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-3
W
2026-06-29 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Puri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Scott Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-06-12 · Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-07 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Qamaruddin Farooqui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Borno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karan Puri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-6
L
2026-04-09 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-08 · Rader/Lee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean-Francois Coste
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41% of games
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.5% of games
4.0
39.7%
52W–79L · 45.6% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.5%
17W–23L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
7W–21L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer