← Search

Elena Carter

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 34W–44L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elena Carter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ACAC Tri Squad - Abed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Christian Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-26 · ACAC Tri Squad - Abed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · ACAC Tri Squad - Abed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Christian Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · ACAC Tri Squad - Abed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · ACAC Net Assets - Weisberg Toft - 40 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Acac Kelsey/Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · ACAC Net Assets - Weisberg Toft - 40 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · ACAC Tri Squad - Abed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Christian Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · ACAC Net Assets - Weisberg Toft - 40 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
W
2026-07-11 · ACAC Net Assets - Weisberg Toft - 40 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Acac Kelsey/Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 55.2% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 40% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.6% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 28.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.3% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#1 Singles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer