← Search

Marc Swann

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 28W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marc Swann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-24 · HPence (PLCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Zhen Zu / Scott Hansen
2026-08-17 · HPence (PLCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-10 · HPence (PLCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · HPence (PLCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-28 · JBoyles (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Pence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-17 · JBoyles (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-24 · JBoyles (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Pence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-16 · HPence (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Basden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-02 · HPence (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Keith Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-26 · HPence (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Keith Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-12 · HPence (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Don Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-23 · HPence (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Pence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 46.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.2% of games
6.5
25%
5W–15L · 39.7% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova