← Search

Alfred Balch

Park City, UT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 51W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alfred Balch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
L
2026-09-05 · Silver Slicers II · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · Silver Slicers II · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Silver Slicers II · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Silver Slicers II · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Silver Slicers II · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glenn Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Stonehocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Ogden Tennis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Ogden Tennis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-1
W
2026-07-22 · Ogden Tennis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carsten Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · Silver Slicers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Reed Reinhold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Silver Slicers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Reed Reinhold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · Ogden Tennis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
21.5%
42W–153L · 38.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.2% of games
6.0
11.1%
5W–40L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
34 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert