← Search

Gina Cappuzzo

Blue Springs, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 83W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gina Cappuzzo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-04-12 · O'Connor, Kelly · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-04 · O'Connor, Kelly · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryalice Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Hunt, Molly · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly OConnor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Hunt, Molly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Michelle Coffey
2026-03-01 · Hunt, Molly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Murry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-01 · Hunt, Molly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-01-30 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Nagy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-18 · Hunt, Molly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-04 · Hunt, Molly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · Cappuzzo, Gina · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathi MacY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · Cappuzzo, Gina · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43% of games
3.5
52.1%
63W–58L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–13L · 26.3% of games
7.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.1% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
70 matches
#1 Singles
22%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams