← Search

Harvinder Sidhu

Greer, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 48W–41L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Harvinder Sidhu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
Stephen Brown / Troy Botts
2026-08-22 · UPTA18C/Shinpoch/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hugo Juarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · UPTA55C/Meredith/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · UPTA55C/Meredith/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · UPTA18C/Shinpoch/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zide Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · UPTA55C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · UPTA18M/Sidhu/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Dejesus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · UPTA18M/Sidhu/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-02 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Sidhu) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Gulli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Sidhu) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Hagler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA18M/Sidhu/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · UPTA18TL/Sidhu/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Garret Conover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 52% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 53.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 59% of games
4.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#3 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert