← Search

Jill Fain

Frisco, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 29W–26L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jill Fain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 30 Lakes Tennis Academy/Fain-Bingham W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-22 · Team 10 Jill Fain/Brenda Bingham 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer OCarroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Team 10 Jill Fain/Brenda Bingham 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Sorden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
W
2026-08-21 · Team 10 Jill Fain/Brenda Bingham 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kirsten Lile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Team 10 Jill Fain/Brenda Bingham 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Sorden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Heather Williams
2026-06-18 · The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · The Lakes/Alwood-Silver W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-11 · The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · The Lakes/Alwood-Silver W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Byrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · The Lakes/Alwood-Silver W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.6%
25W–20L · 51.3% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
23 matches
#1 Singles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer