← Search

Connie Christensen

Columbia, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Connie Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-12 · CTL55/Taylor/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Peebles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · CTL55/Taylor/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Peebles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-01 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · CTL (A) 4.0M 40 & Over (Anderson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Szwec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-24 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Shwedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Hartzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Shwedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-28 · CTL (A) 4.0M 40 & Over (Anderson) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-27 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · CLT18/Freer/WWD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Shwedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-04-10 · CTL40/Tremolada/WWD · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
53%
35W–31L · 53.6% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.7% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
34 matches
#1 Singles
19%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer