← Search

Meg Schell

— year-end
28 matches · 9W–19L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Meg Schell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2024-03-03 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0W MALT Weisbrod · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-02-18 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0W MALT Weisbrod · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Taggart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-02-04 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0W MALT Weisbrod · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Taggart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-01-21 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0W MALT Weisbrod · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-07 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0W MALT Weisbrod · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Taggart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
Tamara Donovan / Dawn Matzke
2023-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-17 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-10 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-19 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-22 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-09-19 · WI Combo MALT 5.5 W Halverson · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Wielgus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-09-12 · WI Combo MALT 5.5 W Halverson · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debra Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams4 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.2% of games
3.0
0%
0W–11L · 18.4% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.2% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#1 Singles
21%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
14%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams