← Search

Lisa Samson

Larchmont, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 112W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Samson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history254 matches
W
2026-07-28 · NRRC Grey Goose Squad 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · NRRC Grey Goose Squad 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah von Glahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · MBYC 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Regan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
Christine Moore / Lea Sergiacomi
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Gerosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Bertisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · MBYC 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Pepe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · NRRC Grey Goose Squad 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Fage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · MBYC 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Carlos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.7%
58W–50L · 52.3% of games
4.0
37.2%
42W–71L · 43.3% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
75 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer