← Search

Daniel Bryant

BALTIMORE, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 79W–49L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Daniel Bryant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-08-25 · HocoCha8.0-40+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · HocoCha8.0-40+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-02 · HocoCha8.0-40+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · Koch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Astle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Lewis Tri 4.5-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Byron Warnken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Leonid Leznik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donggeun Sinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anirudh Sridharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Koch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yannone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SUNG WOON SOON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · HocoCha8.0-40+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana MacHer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · Ghim - Steely Vanguard-40+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
54.2%
26W–22L · 53.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.2% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
86.2%
25W–4L · 61.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova