← Search

Matthew Eglseder

— year-end
63 matches · 42W–21L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Matthew Eglseder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Cortinas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendan Eglseder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Jank · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rachel Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-22 · Jank · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristen Paulmeyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dalton Pregon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Jank · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra Vineyard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-21 · Jank · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra Vineyard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Benjamin Starman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · NE/Eglseder/18&Over4.5M · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-07-06 · Vineyard · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra McGinnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-02 · Kuper · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Max Chiu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-22 · Vineyard · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra McGinnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-08 · Kuper · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Luke Backhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
81%
17W–4L · 61.9% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova