← Search

Heidi Leonard

Mccordsville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 111W–159L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Leonard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
W
2026-09-02 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Rich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Neddy Koech / Katie Morrison
2026-08-26 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Reifeis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-5
W
2026-08-12 · High Tri W CRC Cox · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Rich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Curtiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W WHS Dumas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Kinsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Siby Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Weemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Strack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W WHS Dumas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Kinsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
48W–36L · 54.8% of games
4.5
30.7%
23W–52L · 40.6% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 57.1% of games
8.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
30.2%
16W–37L · 42.7% of games
8.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
54 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams