← Search

Anne Jensen-McAvoy

Plant City, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 61W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Anne Jensen-McAvoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Plant City Triple F Gals/Wyckoff · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Plant City Night Team/Kosar · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · Plant City / Kosar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Mudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Plant City / Kosar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Mudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · Plant City / Kosar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Mudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-20 · Plant City / Wyckoff · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · Plant City / Wyckoff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-07 · Plant City / Kosar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · Plant City Triple F Gals - J. Wyckoff · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-03 · Plant City Night team - J. Kosar · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-02 · Plant City Triple F Gals - J. Wyckoff · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-02-24 · Plant City Night team - J. Kosar · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games
3.5
39.4%
52W–80L · 46.3% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#2 Singles
16%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal