← Search

Beth Batts

Kalamazoo, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 34W–107L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Beth Batts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-11 · MY Rhodes FWL A18-3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Kate MacGuidwin / Susan Richardson
2026-04-25 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Mrozinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-28 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Astrid Goldenbeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7
L
2026-01-31 · WH Menta WSL A18-3.0WW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alaya Neville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-24 · WH Menta FWL A18-3.0WW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Astrid Goldenbeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-22 · PTC Grung FWL A55-7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glorianna Fogarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-09 · PY Rhodes FWL A18-3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-03 · WH Menta FWL A18-3.0WW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-20 · WH Menta FWL A18-3.0WW · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
28.6%
30W–75L · 41.1% of games
3.5
10%
3W–27L · 28.2% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
78 matches
#2 Singles
24%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams