← Search

Andi Lee

Auburn, AL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 92W–34L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Andi Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Williams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Haley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Williams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Munkyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-25 · Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Bergman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-20 · Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Munkyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Bodine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bodine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Irwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameran Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · Bodine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Munkyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Irwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tomoko Maeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Bodine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Munkyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Irwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameran Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Bodine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Munkyung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-13 · Irwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bodine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.4% of games
4.0
73.4%
47W–17L · 59% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.6% of games
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 58.1% of games
8.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.2% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova