← Search

Leanne Farrell

— year-end
31 matches · 16W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Leanne Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-04-29 · LDBU-Bush/RiverRun · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Hamel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-22 · LDBU-Bush/RiverRun · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Edge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-11 · LDBU-Bush/RiverRun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lydia Dayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-02 · LAWA-Wages/River Run · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colleen Penhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-26 · LAWA-Wages/River Run · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cara Stanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-17 · LKGR-Grathwohl/River Run · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Van Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Meagan Palmer / Astrid Peterson
2024-08-20 · LKGR-Grathwohl/River Run · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Van Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-03 · LTUT-Utz/RR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Lyerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-04-19 · LTUT-Utz/RR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-12 · LTUT-Utz/RR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Utz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-05 · LTUT-Utz/RR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-22 · LTUT-Utz/RR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Utz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 54.2% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer