← Search

Jill Cable

Belton, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 29W–27L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Jill Cable to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Haygood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Michael Spruill / Sarah Pick
2022-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Herrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Jonathan Pickle / Rachel Dawson
2022-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Herrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
L
2022-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimmy Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
Matt Jones / Kayla Potts
2022-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Herrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2022-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimmy Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
Kathy M Xia / Shihui Shen
2021-08-29 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Hancock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
Glenda Hinsley / Melody Wilson
2021-08-29 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Hancock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 52% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe