← Search

Chelsea Jennings

Chesapeake, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 70W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Jennings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Walters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen van Daniker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Walters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Sartwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Walters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Sartwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Bartholomew - Bart's Ballerz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Bartholomew - Bart's Ballerz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Dimaya · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carl Apelizan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · Bartholomew - Bart's Ballerz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Beavers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Bartholomew - Bart's Ballerz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Dimaya · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carl Apelizan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Roland Nave championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Bartholomew - Bart's Ballerz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Allen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Dimaya · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carl Apelizan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 54.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 60.5% of games
7.5mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal