Maura Starshak
Chicago, IL
134 matches · 88W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Maura Starshak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history134 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Bela Starkman / Julie Steinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 5 $34.5
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
95.5%
21W–1L · 67% of games
4.0
61.8%
42W–26L · 55% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
8.5
0%
0W–6L · 34.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.