← Search

Ida Randall

Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 19W–27L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ida Randall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CampbellEagen/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonja Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · Eagen/Morgan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Jacque Clem / Christina Johnson
2026-03-27 · Eagen/Morgan · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · Eagen/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonja Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · Eagen/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonja Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-08 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Shoemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Katty McFee / Christina Johnson
2026-03-07 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with LOURDES BLANDINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-08 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-03 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Shoemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-01-25 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-16 · Campbell/Eagen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-09 · Campbell/Eagen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonja Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer