← Search

Greg Lutz

Topeka, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 58W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Lutz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-05-03 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Swope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Swope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-29 · KS/Shipp/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Shipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-12-21 · KS/Shipp/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Perkuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-12-21 · KS/Shipp/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-24 · KS/Shipp/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-14 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Perkuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-31 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-01-11 · Bauersfeld-Topeka · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Clutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-01-07 · Bauersfeld-Topeka · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Yorke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-30 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-23 · KS/Shipp/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 58.3% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova