← Search

Ron Novak

— year-end
234 matches · 88W–146L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ron Novak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Kaim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Espersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Ragner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Lambright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Kaim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Cutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vince Cheverine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tricia Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Michael Curtis / Michael Gonzalez
2026-05-12 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frank Licari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–23L · 26.4% of games
6.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 45.4% of games
6.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 43.4% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.8% of games
6.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 48.1% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
29%
18W–44L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
56 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert