← Search

Girish Ramanathan

Altamont, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 54W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Girish Ramanathan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Luc Belikis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Kirk Allen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Enterprise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Klamka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · Enterprise · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with W Michael Reickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Northern: Enterprise · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Cavanagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Northern: Enterprise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Koh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-2
W
2026-07-08 · Enterprise · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Hook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · Northern: Enterprise · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Klamka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · Enterprise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Gardinier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · Northern: Enterprise · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Tangredi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-31 · Northern: Enterprise · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Koh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Enterprise · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Klamka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
65.6%
40W–21L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
23 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer