← Search

Vish Chandran

— year-end
63 matches · 34W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vish Chandran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with SHENGYONG WANG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Bunge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Gurucharan Ganapathi / William Hill
2026-06-11 · A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keneth Conerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Joshua Lemerman / Glen Andrianov
2026-05-21 · A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Lesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-10-29 · C 8.5M MM1 Burnoski · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Richard Zsigray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-23 · X18 7.0 LT Ruggles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hannah Banas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-18 · A18 4.5M CV Papay · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-07-16 · X18 7.0 LT Ruggles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hannah Banas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-12 · A18 4.0M MM Burnoski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louis Burnoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Maxwell Adelstein / Matthew Morris
2023-06-21 · A18 4.0M MM Burnoski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Patner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-06-18 · X18 7.0 LT Ruggles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Sirak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-13 · A18 4.5M CV Papay · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Aten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 79.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.2% of games
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.3% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.4% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer