← Search

Shannon Kiebler

Littleton, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 156W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shannon Kiebler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
W
2026-09-01 · SS-LGT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Debbie Lathrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Jon Watson / Carla Bidwell
2026-08-16 · KC-CC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Zibell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · SS-LGT PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Danford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · SS-LGT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Debbie Lathrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-23 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jamie Steese / Amber McGregor
2026-07-21 · SS-LGT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Oermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Melucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · KC-CC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matt Westbrook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Melucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · KC-RH NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meghan Geisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
80.6%
54W–13L · 62.6% of games
4.5
45.6%
47W–56L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
93.5%
29W–2L · 63.4% of games
8.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#1 Singles
22%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King