← Search

Amatul Bean

Milton, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 32W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amatul Bean to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Sparks - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thuy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Donna Richards / Mary Bryan
2026-09-08 · Sparks - RS Hard · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-11 · Papajohn - SHL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Bleich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-22 · Bean - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Aspinwall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Papajohn - SHL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Bleich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Bean - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Aspinwall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Nguyen - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reghan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · Andresen - RS Clay · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Andresen - RS Clay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · Nguyen - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thuy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
AnnaLee Wyse
2026-05-13 · Andresen - RS Clay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-12 · Nguyen - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Capozzoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.6% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.9% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 73% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#1 Singles
19%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams