← Search

Janet Ortiz

Toa Alta, PR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 81W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Ortiz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Hacienda Del Sur · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Cuevas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Hacienda Del Sur · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Humberto Lizardi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-14 · Dorado Greens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leonardo Hormaza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · Hacienda Del Sur · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Humberto Lizardi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-25 · Dorado Greens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leonardo Hormaza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Lizbeth Febles Centeno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Lorna Ramirez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Baldrich- Baez · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Amarilis Roman OFarrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Baldrich - Baez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Campos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Baldrich- Baez · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-19 · Baldrich - Baez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivelisse Colon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Baldrich- Baez · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dharma E Concepcion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
36W–36L · 51.6% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.3% of games
6.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova