← Search

Jeanne Baily

Annandale, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
603 matches · 352W–251L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Baily to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history603 matches
W
2026-09-06 · Team 4 Tri and Catch Us · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Borsi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Team 4 Tri and Catch Us · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Team 4 Tri and Catch Us · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Errin Matechak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-5
W
2026-08-02 · Team 2 The Usual Suspects · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Long Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · Team 2 The Usual Suspects · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Team 1 Swinging in to Action · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Polly Middleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Carolyn Greis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Sonia Valdes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-14 · Team 1 Swinging in to Action · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-11 · Team 2 Serve Me A Double 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Team 1 Swinging in to Action · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams131 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
4.0
66.5%
167W–84L · 55.4% of games
4.5
38.1%
16W–26L · 44.6% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 56% of games
7.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.9% of games
8.0
56.8%
42W–32L · 52.6% of games
8.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.5% of games
0.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 32.6% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
15W–10L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
48W–40L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
276 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
193 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
134 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe