← Search

Amy Hafey

Portsmouth, NH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 138W–72L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Hafey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
W
2026-06-29 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Apex:Longshots:Long · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · Apex:LuckyStrings:Prescott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niamh Colpitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Apex:LuckyStrings:Prescott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hilary Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · WWCC:Lobstars:Hafey:Bitter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly McDevitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-25 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · WWCC:Lobstars:Hafey:Bitter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · Apex:LuckyStrings:Prescott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Prescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · WWCC:Lobstars:Hafey:Bitter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · WWCC:Lobstars:Hafey:Bitter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · WWCC:Lobstars:Hafey:Bitter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
70.3%
104W–44L · 58.7% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 32.8% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.8% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
85 matches
#1 Singles
30%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams