← Search

Michelle Alford

— year-end
109 matches · 69W–40L · seasons 2017–2025

Captains: add Michelle Alford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2025-09-07 · BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karin Chafetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-10 · BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Closson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingrid Flintoft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Mary Stiles / Ellen Lauricella
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Closson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Monica Wong / Emily McKinney
2025-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Raifman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Concetta Brown / Katherine Nook
2024-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Escandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Vega
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Takako Kato / Juli Vadney
2024-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christeen Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-10-29 · BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-Horii · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Foland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-09-17 · BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-Horii · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randi Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
73.7%
42W–15L · 58.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 26.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.4% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.5% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova