← Search

Linda Blakemore

— year-end
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Linda Blakemore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Smithson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Smithson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Smithson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Smithson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-19 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-05 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-22 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-18 · Blakemore - Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-19 · FCC Tie Breakers-Blakemore · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Mcneill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-18 · FCC Tie Breakers-Blakemore · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Mcneill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 54.8% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova