Amy Manders
Oneida, WI
74 matches · 45W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Amy Manders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history74 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 55.3% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 54.9% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.