← Search

Annaliese County

Salt Lake City, UT
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 27W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Annaliese County to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-03-08 · Walzer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toon Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-10-18 · Hobbs/Chiazzese · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Horter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-17 · Hobbs/Chiazzese · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sidnee Lavatai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-27 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sophie Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Tomasz Soltyka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-06-14 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hobbs · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sophie Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-07 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Megan Horter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Brian Schmeer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-05-31 · Wasatch Hills-Wasted Tale · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Timothy Barton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-31 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sophie Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-05-22 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sophie Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Tomasz Soltyka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.3% of games
10.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
9.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 57.8% of games
9.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams