← Search

Kim Klimkiewicz

— year-end
56 matches · 45W–11L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kim Klimkiewicz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-13 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · LCTA40/Richey/Kiawah · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · LCTA40/Richey/Kiawah · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristin Ennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-13 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-20 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Hearne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
W
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
77.8%
35W–10L · 61.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.8% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova